Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Delcid v. Burger King LLC et al
as 5:2022cv05052
Defendant:
Matt Carpenter, Burger King LLC, Sarah L. Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Elnora Delcid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Walker v. Barnett et al
as 4:2020cv04059
Defendant:
United States of America, Marcia Holtman, Steve Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton G. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Creek v. Weber et al
as 4:2019cv04205
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Mental Health, Douglas Weber, Dennis Kaemingk and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Creek v. (SDDOC) Mental Health Department et al
as 4:2019cv04174
Petitioner:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and (SDDOC) Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Panzer et al
as 4:2019cv04021
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker and Clayton G. Walker
Defendant:
Marty Jackley, Dennis Kaemingh, Mike Liedholt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taalak v. Pavalis et al
as 3:2019cv03002
Defendant:
Dr. Pavalis, Darren Berg, Clayton Stoche and others
Plaintiff:
Eve Taalak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Krebs et al
as 4:2018cv04015
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Marty Jackley and Kea Warne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Krebs et al
as 5:2018cv05010
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Secretary of State Office, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
High Wolf v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv05007
Plaintiff:
Clayton M. High Wolf
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
