Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv01723
Defendant:
Nurse Paul, Dan Brown, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Cleveland Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv23629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00107
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Shawn Cleveland Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Smith v. Mims et al
as 2:2014cv01316
Petitioner:
Cleveland Smith
Respondent:
Margarette Mims and Jerry Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Mims et al
as 1:2014cv00841
Petitioner:
Cleveland Smith
Respondent:
Margarette Mims and Jerry Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Fresno County et al
as 1:2014cv00792
Petitioner:
Cleveland Smith
Respondent:
Fresno County and City of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Unknown Law Agencies et al
as 1:2014cv00783
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Law Agencies, County of Fresno, Fresno County Sheriff's Dentention Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland Smith v. Ralphs Grocery Company
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ethel Carol Cleveland Smith
Defendant:
Ralphs Grocery Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Smith et al v. Burleson
as 3:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Katrolamecia K. Smith and Cleveland Smith
Defendant:
Tina D. Burleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cecil Edwards, Jr., et al v. Karl Byrd, et al
as 13-1560
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cecil Edwards, Jr., Allen Merrick, Cleveland Smith and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Karl Byrd, Sheriff, Faulkner County, individually, John Randall, Captain, individually, Durwin Lasker, individually and others
Defendant:
Patricia Phillips-Winter and Faulkner County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
