Cases 51 - 60 of 112
GRAF v. CUNNINGHAM et al
as 3:2013cv01468
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD J. GRAF
Respondent:
JOHN CUNNINGHAM and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STRUNK et al v. CHESTER COUNTY DETECTIVES DIVISION et al
as 5:2013cv00824
Plaintiff:
RANCE STRUNK, SR., DARLENE STRUNK, CLIFFORD B. REPOTSKI and others
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY DETECTIVES DIVISION , CHESTER COUNTY D/C RICHARD, JOSEPH WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVERA v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
JACOB RAY RIVERA
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EGIZIO, DALE MEISEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv04464
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD WHITE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WHITEHEAD v. BARRETT et al
as 5:2012cv01637
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GERALD WHITEHEAD, JR.
Defendant:
CRAIG BARRETT and DAMIEN MSEISZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. RUBIN
as 2:2012cv01952
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CLIFFORD HARRIS
Respondent:
ANN R. RUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lester v. Ebbert
as 1:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
Clifford Lester
Respondent:
David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean, et al
as 12-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG MCKEAN, Pennsylvania State Police and JOSHUA THOMAS, Pennsylvania State Police
Joseph Malcomb v. Rachel Dietz, et al
as 11-4462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant:
RACHEL DIETZ, Ambridge Police Officer, ROMUTIS, Chief of Police Ambridge Police Chief and JANET L. DOLAN, Director of PenDot
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN V. SCHULTY, Magistrate Judge and JOHN P. DOHANICH, Common Pleas Judge
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 3:2011cv00238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD B. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
