Cases 61 - 70 of 262
Malenda v. Pinkey et al
as 1:2019cv01522
Defendant:
Clifford Pinkey, Warden Eric Ivey and Kenneth Mills
Plaintiff:
Gregory Malenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pieciak v. Cuyahoga County Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv01467
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Ohio, Eric Ivey, Jane Doe Prison Guards 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Nikki Pieciak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews #222809 v. Gainer et al
as 1:2019cv00493
Defendant:
Unknown Clifford and Unknown Gainer
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mathews #222809
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Undiandeye v. Jackson, et al.
as 1:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Tyresha Brown-O'neal, Cpl. Bodaker, Srt Smyte and others
Plaintiff:
Linus Undiandeye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Federal Bureau of Prisions, et al.
as 4:2019cv01169
Plaintiff:
Tony Fisher and Kellie Rehanna
Defendant:
Dr. Deborah Schultz, Debra Giannone, C. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bogan v. State of Ohio, et al.
as 1:2019cv00812
Respondent:
Clifford Pinkney, Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold, David Yost and others
Petitioner:
Clarence Bogan, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Budish et al
as 1:2019cv00715
Defendant:
Jane Platten, Eric Ivey, Armond Budish and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moderwell v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv00613
Defendant:
Grace Lagreca, Robert Mosher, Raymond Jontony and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Moderwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Budish et al
as 1:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Emily McNeeley, Ken Mills, Eric Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
