Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Titus v. Akoo Brand et al
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Iamsui Titus
Defendant:
Akoo Brand, Vladamir Putin, Tesla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayburn v. Potter et al
as 8:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Clifford R. Rayburn
Defendant:
Danny Potter, United States Marshals, et al, Omaha Police Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Montgoery et al
as 4:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
George Jesse White, II
Defendant:
Scott Montgoery, Clifford, Youngblood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Gooden, III v. Scott County Prosecutors, et al
as 23-2378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott County Prosecutors, Robert Lee Cusack, Meghan Corbin, Judge and others
Clifford Gooden, III v. Brian Heyer, et al
as 23-2385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian E. Heyer, Attorney and Tim Lane, Sheriff
Clifford Gooden, III v. Meghan Corbin, et al
as 23-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Meghan Corbin, Judge, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Scott County Prosecutor, Chris Widmer, Prosecutor and others
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Criswell v. USA
as 4:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Clifford Randolph Criswell, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gooden v. Lane
as 4:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent:
Tim Lane
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
