Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Fassnacht v. Garman
as 3:2018cv01451
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Garman and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clifford Fassnacht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Superintendent et al
as 1:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Deputy Supt. Currberrie, Ms. Digby, Ms. Beth and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv03628
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD STEPHENS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON/MEAT PROCESSOR CORP. and GOLDBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2017cv00211
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD B. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TERRELL v. 19TH DISTRICT POLICE STATION et al
as 2:2017cv02536
Plaintiff:
MARK TERRELL
Defendant:
19TH DISTRICT POLICE STATION, CLIFFORD DOORLEY, DANIEL ORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05974
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD M. SCOTT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Murray v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 16-3200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
FINNEGAN v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv03647
Plaintiff:
ERIK FINNEGAN
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TERRANCE P. MOORE, CLIFFORD MITHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRABOWSKI v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv03349
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD GRABOWSKI
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KAROLSKI v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JOSEPH KAROLSKI
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY , WILLIAM SCHOUPPE , CAROL STEELE-SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
