Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Caudle v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2022cv00453
Petitioner:
Zachary Caudle
Respondent:
Tanya Wilson, Clifford Smith and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boles v. Dalton et al
as 4:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifford Thomas Boles
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Vicki Lynn Dalton, Bryan Patino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goulsby v. Dowling et al
as 4:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Goulsby
Defendant:
Janet Dowling, Randy Harding, Aaron Peruskie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goulsby v. Dowling
as 4:2021cv00162
Petitioner:
Clifford Goulsby
Respondent:
Janet Dowling, L L Collins and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Targett v. Mackey et al
as 4:2019cv00319
Defendant:
Joyce Mackey and Clifford Ray Mackey
Plaintiff:
Loucindy Targett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parga et al v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Parga , Richard Feltz , Tara O'Donley and others
Defendant:
Tulsa County, Vic Regalado , Terry H Bitting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rabbit v. Goodman et al
as 4:2017cv00432
Plaintiff:
James Swimmer Rabbit, Jr
Defendant:
Mitch Goodman, Kiesha Oberg, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierce v. US Baird Corporation, The
as 4:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
Clifford Tierce
Defendant:
US Baird Corporation, The
Intervenor_plaintiff:
American Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson et al v Help Works, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Lawson , Diane C Basilicato , Charlotte Marie Collier/Berghaefer and others
Defendant:
Help Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez-Vasquez v. Kellough et al
as 4:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez-Vasquez
Defendant:
William C Kellough and Clifford J Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
