Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
TGP Communications, LLC, et al v. Jack Sellers, et al
as 22-16826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TGP COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, DBA The Gateway Pundit and JORDAN CONRADSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK SELLERS, BILL GATES, CLINT HICKMAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
ST. MICHAEL'S MEDIA, INC., WE THE PEOPLE - HARTFORD, CONRAD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
TGP Communications LLC et al v. Sellers et al
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
TGP Communications LLC a Missouri limited liability company doing business as Gateway Pundit and Jordan Conradson
Defendant:
Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kari Lake, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 22-16413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Defendant / Appellee:
KATIE HOBBS, Arizona Secretary of State, BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Lake et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kari Lake and Mark Finchem
Defendant:
Kathleen Hobbs, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman and others
Amicus Curiae:
Arizona Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leslie Feldman, et al v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc., et al
as 16-16865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE FELDMAN, LUZ MAGALLANES, MERCEDEZ HYMES and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNIE 2016, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE, MICHELE REAGAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SUZANNE KLAPP, THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, DEBBIE LESKO and others
Leslie Feldman, et al v. Arizona Secretary of State's O, et al
as 16-16698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE FELDMAN, LUZ MAGALLANES, MERCEDEZ HYMES and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNIE 2016, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE, MICHELE REAGAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Feldman et al v. Arizona Secretary of State's Office et al
as 2:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Leslie Feldman , Luz Magallanes , Mercedez Hymes and others
Defendant:
Arizona Secretary of State's Office , Michele Reagan , Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Bernie 2016 Incorporated
Intervenor_defendant:
Arizona Republican Party , Bill Gates , Suzanne Klapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krieger v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01762
Defendant:
Peoria, City of , Bob Barrett , Tony Rivero and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Krieger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
