Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Brown v. Taylor
as 23-4131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK R. TAYLOR, AICP, The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning
Whitaker v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Ramona Pando Whitaker
Defendant:
Clinton E. Brown and Clinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Clinton Brown v. Emil Assentato
as 2:2023cv02972
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Emil Assentato, Tax Deed Enterprises LLC and Steve Weera Tonasut Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor
as 2:2023cv03366
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Clark R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Brown v. Steve Smead
as 2:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Steve Mead and Steve Smead
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Clinton Brown v. Clark Taylor
as 23-55160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK R. TAYLOR, AICP, The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning
Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor
as 2:2022cv09203
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Clark R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
