Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barnes v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Shipman, Culclager, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary T. Cloird v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2511
Petitioner:
Gary T. Cloird, also known as Saba Makkali
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, B Carroll, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saba Makkali v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saba K. Makkali, originally named as Gary T. Cloird
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Abdulaziz/Askew v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wendy Kelley, Lindsey Fortson and others
Plaintiff:
Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloird v. Payne
as 5:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Gary Cloird and Saba K Makkali
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deverick Scott v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 17-2649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelly), Grant Harris, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Radford v. Brooks et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
V Brooks, Cindella Wooten, Erica Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Kelly et al
as 5:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Grant Harris, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik Makkali v. Ray Hobb
as 14-1167
Petitioner - Appellant:
Malik Ka Makkali, also known as Gary T. Cloird
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
