Cases 81 - 90 of 193
Clyde Thompson v. United State
as 16-4414
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Bevard v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00547
Petitioner:
Kenny Clyde Homer Bevard, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fuller, et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Fuller , Timothy Robinson , Stephanie Crowe and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clyde Harper v. Judge Coffey, et al
as 15-2931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde E. Harper
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Coffey and Prosecutor Retelsdorf, of Douglas County
Clyde Bergemann Power Group Americas, Inc. v. City of Fremont, Nebraska
as 8:2015cv00321
Defendant:
City of Fremont, Nebraska
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bergemann Power Group Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harper v. NE DOC
as 8:2015cv00301
Petitioner:
Clyde Ernest Harper
Respondent:
NE DOC
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Clyde O'Guin
as 15-2505
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Clyde O'Guin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schmidt et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02275
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Schmidt , Norman Clyde Larson , Paul A. Kleinschrodt and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roskens et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02253
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Roskens , Jim A. Paulin , Jim Paulin Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
