Cases 1 - 10 of 724
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yoshimoto v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Warren Yoshimoto, Kristin Barroga, Sean Kettley and others
Defendant:
Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
In re: Lancaster Clyde
as 24-10845
Petitioner:
In re: LANCASTER CLYDE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Clyde Thompson, Crystal Ashley, Cayden Thompson and others
Defendant:
James Holley and Anthony P&L, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
United States of America v. Wilson
as 24-314
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES CLYDE WILSON and Jim Wilson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arcell, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE R. ARCELL, JOSE M. BRITO, JAN-MARIE BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NIEBOR, GABRIEL GARAVANIAN and JUNE STANSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES, UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
USA v. Spates
as 23-30898
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clyde O. Spates, also known as Ty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
