Cases 41 - 50 of 132
COBB-HAYE v. MACLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv04278
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB-HAYE
Defendant:
MS. MACLAUGHLIN, LINDA RENICK, ROBERT DAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB v. WEIGHKNECHT
as 5:2015cv04246
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB
Defendant:
SARAH WEIGHKNECHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BISHOP v. COBB COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv03065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BISHOP
Defendant:
COBB COUNTY, J.M. BYRUM, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P. v. COBB THEATRES IV, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02887
Plaintiff:
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
Defendant:
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC and COBB THEATRES III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC v. WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
as 2:2015cv02878
Plaintiff:
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC
Defendant:
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Prison Legal News et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News , Daniel Denvir , Philadelphia City Paper and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Amicu:
Amy B Ginensky and Eli M. Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv05263
Plaintiff:
AMANDA COBB
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cobb et al v. Nye et al
as 4:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Beth Ann Cobb and Richard Cobb
Defendant:
Charles Nye , Wagner Millwork , Wagner Nineveh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB v. TRUONG et al
as 2:2013cv01750
Plaintiff:
FRANK M. COBB
Defendant:
MINH-TRI V. TRUONG and JOHN and/or JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
