Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hullinger v. Forgey MD et al
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Edward Davies, Unknown Employees of Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., J Cockrell and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hullinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Economan et al v. Cockrell et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
United States, James D Luttrull, Jr, Jessica Krug and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Dale Economan and Economan and Associates Family Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COCKRELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01037
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JESSIE-BEY v. GEO et al
as 1:2017cv04578
Respondent:
JACK ADAMS, JAMES ANDREWS, JERRY BALENTINE and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. COCKRELL
as 1:2014cv01140
Defendant:
DR. DALE COCKRELL
Plaintiff:
CARL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cockrell
as 2:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Carl Johnson
Defendant:
Dr Dale Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Fries et al
as 1:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong
Defendant:
Kenneth Fries, Karen Richards and Jennifer Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY v. KNIGHT, et al.
as 1:2013cv01932
Defendant:
DALE K. COCKRELL, GINA HUSE, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
