Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vaughn et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00911
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Felton Vaughn, Fred Snetzer, Donal Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Stringfield v. West Rock Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Collis Stringfield
Defendant:
West Rock Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Collis-Bey v. Covington County, Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Aphrey B. Collis-Bey
Defendant:
Covington County, Alabama, Amy Jones and Nathan Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collie et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
Ruby Collie and Quentin Collie
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , Furukawa Electric North America APD INC and Furukawa Electric Co. Limited, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collie v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Luana Jean Collie
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Jassen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
T. Jones, Travis J. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Colly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01225
Plaintiff:
Travonte K. Butler
Defendant:
Officer Colly, Officer Garbold and Administrator Henline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. USA
as 1:2008cv00216
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Collie Bo Young Evans, Jr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
