Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAMBLEN v. FRYE et al
as 1:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAMBLEN
Defendant:
SUSAN FRYE, LAURA ALLISON SMITH, THERESSA PHIPPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shreve v. McLennon et al
as 5:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Shreve
Defendant:
Chris McLennon, Kristen Fetter, Colon Willoughby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreve v. Fetter et al
as 5:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Shreve
Defendant:
Kristen Lynn Fetter, Colon Willoughby, Jr., Tina Hoagland Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Green v. Willoughby et al
as 5:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Green, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Colon Willoughby and Margaret Eagles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Stephens et al
as 5:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Donald W. Stephens and Colon Willoughby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
STUART, et al v. HUFF, et al
as 1:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D. , JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D. , DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D. and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D. , ROY COOPER , LANIER M. CANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
