Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MacDonald v. Colonial Savings et al
as 7:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
William MacDonald
Defendant:
Colonial Savings and Davd R. Karle
Seeboth v. Colonial Savings, F.A.
as 1:2018cv01006
Defendant:
Colonial Savings, F.A.
Plaintiff:
Casey Seeboth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walters et al v. Colonial Savings et al
as 3:2018cv02983
Defendant:
Colonial National Mortgage and Colonial Savings
Plaintiff:
Lynda Walters and Jerry Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler et al v. Colonial Savings, F.A.
as 4:2018cv02491
Defendant:
Colonial Savings, F.A.
Plaintiff:
Frank Butler and Lashanda Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davidson et al v. Colonial Savings et al
as 3:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Adam Davidson and Nancy Davidson
Defendant:
Colonial Savings , Colonial Savings, F.A. and Brett Chaffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago et al v. Colonial Savings, F.A. et al
as 3:2014cv02055
Plaintiff:
Fernando R. Santiago and Karen D. Santiago
Defendant:
Colonial Savings, F.A. , Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago , The Wolf Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ladd et al v. Colonial Savings, FA
as 3:2013cv01817
Plaintiff:
Billie J. Ladd and Gary D. Price
Defendant:
Colonial Savings, FA
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jones et al v. Colonial Savings F.A. et al
as 1:2013cv12092
Plaintiff:
David C. Jones and Tracy Lee Jones
Defendant:
Colonial Savings F.A. , Colonial National Mortgage, a Division of Colonial Savings F.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Colonial Savings FA v. Gens et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Defendant:
Timothy H Gens and Laura A Gens
Plaintiff:
Colonial Savings FA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
McGowens v. Colonial Savings
as 1:2012cv01462
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael McGowens
Defendant:
Colonial Savings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
