Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michaelis v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts et al
as 1:2020cv11788
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Jarrod A. Michaelis
Calzada v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
as 1:2019cv10039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Calzada
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ecker v. Goguen et al
as 3:2019cv10020
Respondent:
Colette Goguen, Maura Healey and Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Petitioner:
John Ecker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collymore v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts et al
as 1:2018cv12346
Defendant:
Zena Mitchell, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and South Bay's Classification Division Land its agents
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Collymore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts et al
as 1:2018cv11864
Defendant:
LT Dwight Smith and Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Plaintiff:
Brutus Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
as 1:2015cv13576
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Harihar v. US Bank NA et al
as 1:2015cv11880
Plaintiff:
Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
US Bank NA, RMBS CMLTI 2006 AR-1, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Owens v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts et al
as 1:2011cv10883
Petitioner:
Julius Owens
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mains v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2010cv10806
Plaintiff:
Walter Mains
Defendant:
Jean Ambrose and Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
