Cases 21 - 30 of 451
Biro v. Flynn et al
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Timothy Flynn, Tavis Henry, Mike Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brooks v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Juanisha Cherie Brooks
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Robert Hindenlang, Stefanie Kapusta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lugo Trejo
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Nelson Lugo Trejo
Defendant:
Nelson Lugo-Trejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Patrick Lockhart
as 23-1294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK LOCKHART
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-employment Rights Act - USERRA
(PS) Rhee v. Medical Board of CA, et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Hanna Q. Rhee
Defendant:
Medical Board of California, Xavier Becerra, Kimberly Kirchmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tridentis, LLC v. City of Alexandria
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tridentis, LLC
Defendant:
City of Alexandria
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Frye v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Debi Frye
Defendant:
Scott H. Jenkins, Commonwealth of Virginia, County of Culpeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
