Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Anderson v. Reep et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff: Albert Anderson
Defendant: FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. USA
as 5:2023cv00001
Petitioner: Stephen Condon Peters
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Baccus v. Condon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2014cv02248
Plaintiff: John Baccus
Defendant: Charlie M Condon, Alan Wilson, William Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackburn v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2009cv03169
Plaintiff: Richard E Blackburn
Defendant: South Carolina, State of, Charlie Condon, South Carolina Legislature and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Catherine Young v. State of South Carolina
as 09-7286
Petitioner - Appellant: CATHERINE YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and CHARLES M. CONDON
Willie Owens v. State of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6468
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIE J. OWENS
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General, State of South Carolina
Burns v. Maynard, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2002cv01263
Petitioner: Michael Burns
Respondent: Gary Maynard and Charles Condon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harley v. Condon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2002cv01341
Petitioner: Thomas Harley
Respondent: Charles Condon and State Of SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?