Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Fain v. Douglas County Jail Comander and Staff et al
as 6:2012cv00169
Defendant:
Dr. Terry C. Bancroft, Dr. Steven Blum, Bobb RN and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Fain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Gurule, et al v. Mike Root, et al
as 11-36042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD E. GURULE, ASHLEY T. MENG, BILLY D. DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE ROOT, Jail Commander, CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC., STEVEN BLUM and others
Gurule et al v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2011cv01274
Defendant:
Dr. Terry C. Bancroft, C.F.M. Kitchen Manager Gisel Bitterman, Dr. Steven Blum and others
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Davis, Dennis R. Fain, Richard E. Gurule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicks v. Brewer et al
as 6:2010cv01220
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Nicks
Defendant:
Carl Brewer, Norman D. Williams, Jessie M. Cornwell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lindsey v. Frederick County Commissioners et al
as 1:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Derek Edwin Lindsey
Defendant:
Frederick County Commissioners, Charles A. Jenkins, Steven Rau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael v. Frederick County Commissioners et al
as 8:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Michael
Defendant:
Frederick County Commissioners, Charles A. Jenkins, Steven E. Rau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. County of Frederick et al
as 1:2008cv02838
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. McFarland
Defendant:
County of Frederick, Frederick County Sheriff's Department, Rau and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
