Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jeremy Braulick v. Paul Rees, et al
as 23-35331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REES, ERIC THOMAS, JODY COZBY and others
Thomas Sliwinski v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 23-35074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EMIL SLIWINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN, PAUL REES, BILTOFT, Lt. and others
Braulick v. Rees et al
as 6:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Braulick
Defendant:
Paul Rees, Eric Thomas, Jody Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto
Defendant:
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Albert v. Montana Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-35637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC-MT CLINICAL SERVICES DIVISION, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Winner et al
as 6:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
John O. Miller
Defendant:
Connie Winner, Cindy Hiner, Paul Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sliwinski v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thomas Emil Sliwinski
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Paul Rees, Lt. Biltoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Tricia Jory, Paul Rees, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Albert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary v. Michaels et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Sgt. Quinn, Paul Rees, D Unit Manager Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Clary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
