Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Ellis v. WellsFargo Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Willie H. Ellis
Defendant:
WellsFargo Bank, Yale University, CaixaBank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Quigley et al v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 4:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
John E Quigley and Frances Quigley
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, The Conocophillips Company Benefits Committee and John/ Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
DuBuc v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 4:2023cv04313
Plaintiff:
Barbara DuBuc
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ConocoPhillips Company v. Totem Well Service LLC
as 4:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
Totem Well Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Taylor v. Concho Resources Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Jerry Taylor
Defendant:
Concho Resources Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company
Intervenor Defendant:
RUDTUK Operating LLC and Ally Consulting LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Galvan v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ademar Galvan
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Krempasky v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 4:2022cv02800
Plaintiff:
Greg Krempasky
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Hamilton v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 6:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY LP
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Ford v. Conoco Phillips Company
as 4:2021cv03099
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ford
Defendant:
Conocco Phillips Company and ConocoPhillips
Intervenor Defendant:
Bedrock Petroleum Consultants, LLC and Bedrock PC 1099, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
