Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 162
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff: MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant: RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GRAVES v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00243
Petitioner: KANE CONRAD GRAVES
Respondent: WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re: ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant: M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Negley v. North Middleton Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff: Jeremiah J. Negley
Defendant: North Middleton Police Department and Blake Conrad Bilbrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Ransom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff: Kyle Rainey
Defendant: Kevin Ransom, Jason Bohinski, Richardo Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENEDETTO
as 2:2022mc00068
Reed v. Garcia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff: Jalil S. Reed
Defendant: Lt. Garcia, Lt. M. Conrad, C.O. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff: Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant: c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OKPOR v. BENEDETTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00906
Plaintiff: MICHAEL OKPOR
Defendant: CONRAD J. BENEDETTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?