Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Waddell v. Meyer
as 1:2019cv00789
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Waddell
Defendant:
Conrad V. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
BUHOLTZ v. TROMBITAS et al
as 1:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BUHOLTZ
Defendant:
SIMEON G. TROMBITAS, RICHARD N. HELFER, DAVID E. SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUHOLTZ v. TROMBITAS et al
as 1:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BUHOLTZ
Defendant:
SIMEON G. TROMBITAS, RICHARD N. HELFER, DAVID E. SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyda Conner v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 14-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA P. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, THOMAS R. LAMONT, Assistant Secretary of the Army and others
White v. Schumann, et al
as 14-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
KLAUS P. SCHUMANN, Chief, Case Management Division, BRUCE P. GIPE, Director, Office of Management, Planning, Board of Veteran Appeals, CONRAD V. MEYER, Army Board for Correction of Military Records and others
White v. Schumann et al
as 6:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Rickey White
Defendant:
Klaus P. Schumann, Bruce P. Gipe, Conrad V. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammond v. Meyer
as 2:2013cv00669
Plaintiff:
Lionel W. Hammond
Defendant:
Conrad V. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, john McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, John McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
White v. Scharnberger et al
as 6:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rickey White
Defendant:
Robert C. Scharnberger, Conrad V. Meyer, Myles L. Deering and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
