Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bliss v. Corecivic, Inc.
as 1:2022mi00059
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Bliss
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc.
Respondent:
State Bar of Georgia
CAMPBELL v. CORECIVIC INC et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC, Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peavy et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Neki Peavy and Billy Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffee Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. CoreCivic, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Coffee Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Georgia State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00354
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy C. Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Wesley Brown, Donald Futch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
City of Alamo, GA, CoreCivic, Inc. and Cassandra Boney
Plaintiff:
Ariel Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARRIENTOS et al v. CORECIVIC INC
as 4:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
WILHEN HILL BARRIENTOS , MARGARITO VELAZQUEZ-GALICIA and SHOAIB AHMED
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
