Cases 41 - 50 of 338
Bennett v. Edwards et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Anthony Edwards, C.T.S. Garber, Director Jessica Sterner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Sterner et al
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Director Jessica Sterner, Mark Melusky, Captain Sauble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Barber et al
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Stacy Barber, Tammy Zook, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEITLER v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2022cv00804
Petitioner:
COREY BEITLER
Respondent:
KYLE RUSSELL, LEE URSCHEL, KYLE BERARDUNUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bennett v. Wallace et al
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Wallace, Lt. Elliot and Lt. Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEITLER v. City of Allentown et al
as 5:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
COREY BEITLER
Defendant:
City of Allentown, Lehigh County, PrimeCare Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv02122
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
C.O. Reed, C.O. Belson, Lt. Mccluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDIG v. STOLAR
as 1:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
COREY R. KENDIG
Defendant:
NICHOLAS STOLAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Arter et al
as 3:2021cv01907
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Lt. Arter, Warden William Bechtold, Deputy Warden Jeff Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPKINS v. MGM GROWTH PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04556
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
MGM GROWTH PROPERTIES LLC, PAUL SALEM, THOMAS ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
