Cases 1 - 10 of 338
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nelson v. Luzerne County DA's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Nelson
Defendant:
Luzerne County DA's Office, Judge(s) and Adult Probation/Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson-Pacewicz, Sr. v. Luzerne County ETL et al
as 3:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Nelson-Pacewicz, Sr.
Defendant:
Luzerne County ETL and Luzerne County Children & Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashford, Jr. v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Corey Dickerson, Deputy Warden Ray and Deputy Warden Levalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Corey Hess
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ashford, Jr. v. Ray et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray, Warden Briggs, Deputy Warden Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart-Richardson v. Sisley et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Corey Stewart-Richardson
Defendant:
George Sisley and Lt. Michael White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SOLANE et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
NICOLE SOLANE, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCININI, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFOREST v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. NURSE
as 5:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
COREY LAFOREST
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. NURSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
