Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Mark White v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., DOCTOR RICKEY J. COLEMAN, Acting Chief Medical Officer, DOCTOR PETER E. SICES and others
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, KRISTIE BADDER, E. COE HILL and others
Matthew Lott v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW LESLIE LOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., R. JINDELL, Physician Assistant, PETER SCICES, Medical Doctor and others
Blaurock (ID 86516) v. Southwind Surgical Group et al
as 2:2022cv04381
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Blaurock
Defendant:
Southwind Surgical Group, Brandon S. Cunningham, Alaina D. Dressler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Matthew Lott v. Corizion, Inc., et al
as 22-1752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. LOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., R. JINDELL, Physician Assistant, PETER SCICES, Medical Doctor and others
Doss #531147 v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Timmy Junior Doss #531147
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. and Michigan State Industrial Optical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook #290601 v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook #290601
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. and Unknown Schad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 22-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC. and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE OF MICHIGAN, P.C.
Dykes #201541 v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes #201541
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Timothy Stallman, Wendy Jamros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Davis, Jr. v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 21-1692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY ANTONIO DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., REGISTERED NURSE ERIKA VANNORTRICK, AMBER JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
