Cases 41 - 49 of 49
RHONDA GADBERRY v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01396
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BARNES, DAVID BROWN, KELLEY L. CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA GADBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elam v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Hillard Elam
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Westville Correctional Facility , Corizon Health Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TURNER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00983
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, RUSSEL ARCHER, BRITNER and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
AKEEM D. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Maisano v. National Commission on Correct, et al
as 15-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE MAISANO
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ZURAN VUHCEVIC, CHRIS JOHNSON and others
SAGE v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00745
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., JANE DOE, SGT. E DORM and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maisano v. National Commission on Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2015cv02683
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
National Commission on Correctional Health Care, Zuran Vuhcevic, Chris Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matson v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Brenda Matson
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County , Tracy Brown , Judy Clerget and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
JOHNSON v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00539
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CORIZON, INC., DOE FOUNDATION and others
Plaintiff:
SHANDRA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
