Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Christine Diamond et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03534
Plaintiff:
Christine Diamond , Stephanie Fischer , Brittany Alperstein and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., County of Alameda and Gregory Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Tanti Martinez , M.M. , T.M. and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Harold Orr, Tehmina Kanwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaik Sokhikian v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2016cv00463
Defendant:
M. Cadarelli, Corizon Health, Inc., County of Santa Barbara and others
Plaintiff:
Gaik Sokhikian
Howard v. Tulare et al
as 1:2016at00046
Defendant:
County of Tulare and Corizon Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Weston Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharayah Herrera v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09025
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Goleta, City of Santa Barbara and others
Plaintiff:
Sharayah Herrera
Jackson Velasco v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2015cv08594
Defendant:
Merilee Barba, Bill Brown, Bill Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson Velasco
Belton v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv00832
Plaintiff:
Dwight Clayton Belton
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Department and Corizon Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiGiantomasso et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2014cv01633
Plaintiff:
Laurie DiGiantomasso and Randy DiGiantomasso
Defendant:
Tulare County, Mike Boudreaux, Ernie Ceballos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.H. v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2011cv02868
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc, Ryan Madigan, Solomon Unubun and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Harrison, Jr., Michelle Henshaw, Tiffany Harrison and others
Intervenor:
Kristy Kite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
