Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Bounds v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Bounds
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., J. Cofield, E. Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malay v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv06021
Plaintiff:
John Leroy Malay
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Paula Lutz, Alice Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. MO Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv04025
Plaintiff:
Williette Smith
Defendant:
MO Department of Corrections, Corizon, Inc. f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Inc., ("CMS"), John Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Z.D. v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv02144
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Thomas Villmer, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Z.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Steele et al
as 4:2012cv01548
Plaintiff:
Lamont Williamson
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Unknown Null, Unknown Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kyle A. Roberts
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Dwayne V. Kempker, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitley v. Corizon, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gailian Ray Whitley
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Corizon, Inc.
as 2:2012cv04136
Plaintiff:
Gailian Ray Whitley
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Hardman et al
as 2:2012cv04124
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Hardman, John Doe, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
