Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Jackson v. Perez et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Manuel Perez, Chris Rodriguez, Tyson Pouge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
as 3:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Jackson v. Nathan Hoffman
as 23-2065
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Warden
JACKSON v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN PECORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Douglas Jackson v. Quentin Bolton, et al
as 23-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON, named as Douglas Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN HOULT, individual and official capacity, LIBRARIAN BOMER, individual and official capacity, COUNSELOR KEVIN COLLISON, individual and official capacity and others
Jackson #748757 v. Bolton et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant:
Quentin Bolton, Unknown Hoult, Unknown Bomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
