Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Proctor v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Proctor
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , William Crane, Virginia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McDonald v. CCA
as 11-15440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2010cv01552
Plaintiff:
Toromi Washington
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Akhtar Hamidi, Robert Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elabed vs CCA
as 1:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Hanni Elabed
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America Inc, CCA Western Properties Inc, Philip Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Darin Jones
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daniel Camacho v. Bruno Stolc, et al
as 10-15024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MORALES CAMACHO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUNO STOLC, Warden, Red Rock Correctional Center, in his individual and official capacity, GILBERT LAGUNAS, in his individual and official capacity and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Roger Gartin v. CCA
as 09-35911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER GARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
