Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Bamberger v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 5:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Scott Roy Bamberger
Respondent:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bamberger v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 8:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
Scott Roy Bamberger
Respondent:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RUFUS v. COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 3:2020cv00092
Defendant:
CLAY D LAND, COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, GEORGIA STATE OF and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Harris v. Corrections Corp. of America
as 19-10508
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL G. HARRIS
Eckerd v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 5:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Tiffany Osterhous, United States of America, Correction Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckerd v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Defendant:
Unknown C/O(s), C/O FNU Suggs, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Underwood et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
William Jordan Underwood, Michael Cody, Kim T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis Hunter v. CXW, et al
as 18-10055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Clark v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Clark
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
