Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Libby et al
as 5:2024ct03031
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Officer Tammy Libby, Sgt. William Owens, Officer Cory Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Cory Buckley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hudson v. Biancardi et al
as 5:2022ct03445
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Rosemary E. Biancardi, Cory D. Collins, Timothy Vigus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byers v. Boone
as 5:2022ct03303
Plaintiff:
Karen G. Byers
Defendant:
Corie L. Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogg v. U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) et al
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Fogg
Defendant:
U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Division of Department of Homeland Security, Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ellis v. Merci et al
as 5:2022ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Ellis
Defendant:
Sergeant Merci, James Honeycutt, Cory Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Boone
as 5:2021ct03327
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hughes Estes
Defendant:
Corie L. Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
France v. Secretary of Prisons et al
as 5:2021ct03320
Plaintiff:
Cory Eugene France
Defendant:
Secretary of Prisons and John Doe Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaKemper v. Owens et al
as 5:2021ct03293
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
Barney Owens, Sherri Valerio, Corie Millis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
