Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Keathley v. Cambell County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Cambell County Sheriffs Dept, James Farmer, Jordon Huskey and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly C Keathley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Hairston et al
as 3:2019cv00617
Defendant:
Blue Mountain Transportation, LLC and Camare Hairston
Plaintiff:
Cory D. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gentry v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01183
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cory Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adams et al v. Adient US LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01179
Plaintiff:
Shari Carter, Joyce D Adams, Francene Burton and others
Defendant:
Adient US LLC, Ferro Corporation, Manufacturers Industrial Group, LLC and others
Undetermined:
Circuit Court Clerk Beverly Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Carter et al v. Fahy
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Romarto Carter, Andre Stephens, Trevar Jacoby and others
Defendant:
Gerald Fahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Henry County Jail
as 1:2017cv01210
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Long, Elijah J. Wood, Rock A. Foster and others
Defendant:
Henry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals et al
as 2:2017cv02334
Plaintiff:
C. G.
Defendant:
Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals, Memphis Obstetrics and Gynecological Association, P.C., Cory R. Tinker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv02225
Movant:
Cory Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nelsen v. Nelsen et al
as 3:2016cv02778
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Nelsen
Defendant:
Cori L.E. Nelsen, Peggy R. Smith, Martin Sir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
