Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Brush et al
as 1:2019cv01997
Defendant:
Counselor, Horn, Brush and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Dillon Blodgett et al. v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv02690
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Leonard and Estate of Dillon Blodgett
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC. , Correctional Healthcare Companies, LLC. , Montrose County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullens v. Wiegand et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
Monique Cullens
Defendant:
Robert Wiegand II , Danos Rentals LLC and Wiegand Attorneys & Counselors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huffman v. Counselor Flores et al
as 1:2014cv01069
Plaintiff:
Richard Huffman
Defendant:
Counselor Flores and Dr. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Federal Corrections Officers 1-10 et al
as 1:2013cv01701
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Wilder
Defendant:
Federal Corrections Officers 1-10, Federal Corrections Counselors 1-3, Federal Corrections Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Counselor Foster
as 1:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Counselor Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2008cv01157
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Zita Weinshienk, Boyd Boland and Counselor Madison
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dagen v. Hummer et al
as 1:2007cv00964
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dagen
Defendant:
Wayne (I) G. Hummer, Jr., Wayne G. Hummer, Jr., Reese, Pugh, Samley, Wagenseller & Mecum, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
