Cases 1 - 8 of 8
(PC) Carroll v. Vallejo Police Department, et al.
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Deon Carroll
Defendant:
Vallejo Police Department, Solano County Jail, L A County Juvenile Halls and Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armando Paniagua v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Armando Paniagua
Defendant:
a public entity COUNTY OF ORANGE, A public entity ORANGE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, ORANGE COUNTY JUVENILE HALL and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Joshua Laine, et al v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty., et al
as 19-16925
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW OFICES OF SILVA AND ASSOCIATES, CRISTIN LOEW, ANNE HOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANNE MARINO, RICKY MARINO, DANICA DECLUE and others
Laine et al v. Superior Court of Alameda County Hayward Hall of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv04390
Defendant:
Cheryl Hicks, Judicial Council, Barbara Barovsky and others
Plaintiff:
Grace Huber, Joshua Laine, Daniel Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G.C. v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2017cv04573
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara , Santa Clara County Juvenile Hall, Mark Morales and others
Plaintiff:
G. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alspa v. Washington County Juvenile Hall
as 3:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
Luther Raymond Alspa
Defendant:
Washington County Juvenile Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alspa v. Washington County Juvenile Hall
as 3:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
Luther Raymond Alspa
Defendant:
Washington County Juvenile Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv02070
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Huff , Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
