Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Norwood v. Wexford Health Service Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service Inc., Dr. West, Kim Czerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
DiMaio v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Tony F. DiMaio
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Patricia Burke, County of Kane and others
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Flowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hollister v. County of Kane Medical et al
as 1:2018cv08282
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Hollister, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Kane Medical and Dr. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollister v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2018cv07296
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Hollister, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxxam Partners, LLC et al v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2017cv05707
Plaintiff:
Maxxam Partners, LLC and Glenwood Academy
Defendant:
County of Kane , Kane County Zoning Board of Appeals and Kane County Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Elston et al v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2016cv04979
Plaintiff:
April Elston and Kenya Elston
Defendant:
County of Kane and Brian Demeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prison Legal News v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2015cv09250
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
County of Kane , Donald E. Kramer , Corey Hunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hare v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2014cv01851
Plaintiff:
Jamar Hare
Defendant:
County of Kane, Sheriff Patrick Perez, Chris Lauzen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
