Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fredrika Miller, et al v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 23-11372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRIKA MORRISSETTE MILLER and GARY L. SAUER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
Miller et al v. City of Montgomery et al(MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01049
Plaintiff:
Fredrika Morrissette Miller and Gary L. Sauer, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and County of Montgomery, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01028
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, County of Montgomery, Alabama and D. T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Malloy v. County of Montgomery, Alabama, et al
as 19-10920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, WILLIAM A. SHASHY, Circuit Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. County of Montgomery, Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00665
Defendant:
Charles N. Price, County of Montgomery, Alabama, William A. Shashy and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2009cv00446
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
State of Alabama, City of Montgomery, Brewbaker Motors Dodge Chrysler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
