Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 106
County of Santa Cruz v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02261
Defendant: Nu Mark LLC, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Plaintiff: County of Santa Cruz, Individually and on Behalf of the People of the State of California and County of Santa Cruz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Matthews v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv01619
Plaintiff: Darin Matthews
Defendant: Name Unknown Scotts Valley Police Officer Badge No. 5430, Name Unknown Scotts Valley Police Officer Badge No. 5281, City of Scotts Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00647
Defendant: Marcus Mendez, Matt Johnston, Bryan Hackett and others
Plaintiff: David R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaylor v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02024
Defendant: Andrew Pierce, William James Rahal, Michael Maxwell and others
Plaintiff: Roy Kaylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Britton et al v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv04263
Defendant: County of Santa Cruz Planning Department and County of Santa Cruz
Plaintiff: Cove Britton and Matson Britton Architects, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Savannah Smith, et al v. City of Capitola, et al
as 19-16298
Defendant: JIM HART, Santa Cruz County Sheriff, NOE HERNANDEZ, Watsonville Police Officer, CHRIS VIGIL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAVANNAH SMITH, THANH-THANH HOANG, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to Luke Smith, deceased, LUKE SMITH, Deceased, through his Successor in Interest and others
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF CAPITOLA and PEDRO ZAMORA, Capitola Police Officer
Savannah Smith, et al v. County of Santa Cruz, et al
as 19-16241
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, CHRIS VIGIL, JEFFREY EISNER and others
Defendant: NOE HERNANDEZ, Watsonville Police Officer, JIM HART, Santa Cruz County Sheriff, PEDRO ZAMORA, Capitola Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAVANNAH SMITH, LUKE SMITH, Deceased, through his Successor in Interest, THANH-THANH HOANG, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to Luke Smith, deceased and others
Sacrament Collective Pentecostal Church, Inc v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02729
Defendant: Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department, a County (Municipal) Agency, County of Santa Cruz, Santa Clara Department of Human Services, a County Agency and others
Plaintiff: Sacrament Collective Pentecostal Church, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackie et al v. County of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv02096
Defendant: Ralph Millar, Jim Hart, County of Santa Cruz and others
Plaintiff: Jennifer Collman and Jennifer Mackie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?