Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bishop v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
as 7:2021cv01434
Petitioner:
Donald Bishop
Respondent:
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Jenny Abbott and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arthur Malloy v. County of Montgomery, Alabama, et al
as 19-10920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, WILLIAM A. SHASHY, Circuit Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. County of Montgomery, Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00665
Defendant:
Charles N. Price, County of Montgomery, Alabama, William A. Shashy and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Hines v. Justice Shaw, et al
as 17-10431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTICE SHAW, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal, JUSTICE WISE, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal, JUSTICE MAIN, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
as 1:2015cv04098
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Reynolds et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds, Court of Criminal Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
