Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Russell Showers v. Courtney Rodgers, et al
as 23-1241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL SHOWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. COURTNEY RODGERS, M.D., Medical Director/Supervising Physician at SCI-Mahanoy, JOHN STEINHART, Correctional Health Care Administrator, KIM MINARCHICK, CCS/Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) and others
Rodgers v. First Federal Credit Control, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Courtney Rodgers
Defendant:
First Federal Credit Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodgers v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Courtney Rodgers
Defendant:
Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DeJesus v. Stinehart et al
as 4:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Alejandro DeJesus
Defendant:
John Stinehart, Courtney Rodgers, Jenna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Showers v. Rodgers, M.D. et al
as 3:2020cv01868
Defendant:
John Steinhart, Correct Care Solutions (CCS), Patricia Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Showers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz, Jr. v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2019cv01735
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. John Steinhart, Dr. Courtney Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Bienvenido Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaddy v. Noel et al
as 1:2018cv01860
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel and D.O. Courtney Rodgers
Plaintiff:
Lester Eaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemper v. Steinhart et al
as 1:2017cv01833
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kemper
Defendant:
John Steinhart, Courtney Rodgers and Kimberly Minarchick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Gordon et al
as 3:2017cv01230
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Payne
Defendant:
Margaret Gordon, Ulrich Klemm, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Irving Murray
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, T Debalso, B. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
