Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Covey v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00657
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Shannon Early Covey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Covey v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
Chassidy A. Covey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Piccone v. Iancu et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Petitioner:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Andrei Iancu, William Covey, John and Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Ensley et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wilber Ensley , Covey Andrews , Shamar Archer and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia , Jason Norton , Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shia v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2016cv01051
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Michelle K. Lee, Sarah Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Bang-er Shia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swyers v. United States Patent & Trademark Office et al
as 1:2016cv01042
Defendant:
United States Patent & Trademark Office, William R. Covey, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Swyers and Matthew H. Swyers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Piccone v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00536
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Michele Lee, William Covey, William Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Andrews v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00572
Plaintiff:
Covey Andrews
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Covey v. Wallens Ridge Psychiatric Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tony Wayne Covey
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge Psychiatric Dept. and Dr. R. Krishnappa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth K. Daly
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia , Andrew T. Covey , Armon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
