Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Thompson et al v. CoxCom, Inc. et al.
as 5:2009ml02048
Plaintiff:
Kristi L Thompson, Kristi L Thompson, Kristi L Thompson and others
Defendant:
CoxCom Inc, CoxCom Inc, CoxCom Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Gelder v. CoxCom Inc
as 5:2009cv00635
Plaintiff:
Bradley Gelder, Bradley Gelder and Bradley Gelder
Defendant:
CoxCom Inc, CoxCom Inc and CoxCom Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Abdullah v. COXCOM Inc
as 2:2009cv03264
Plaintiff:
David Abdullah
Defendant:
COXCOM Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Joseph Brady et al v. CoxCom Inc
as 8:2009cv00441
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Brady, John Joseph Brady, John Joseph Brady and others
Defendant:
CoxCom Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Egghead Telecom Inc et al v. CoxCom Inc
as 4:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Egghead Telecom, Inc. and Eddie L Kremeier
Defendant:
CoxCom, Inc. and CoxCom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Prezgay v. Cox Communications et al.,
as 2:2009cv00614
Plaintiff:
Sandra Prezgay, Sandra Prezgay and Sandra Prezgay
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., Cox Nevada Telecom, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mahaffey v. CoxCom, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
Johnny G Mahaffey and Johnny G Mahaffey
Defendant:
CoxCom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hortenstine v. COXCOM Inc
as 2:2009cv03065
Plaintiff:
Barksdale Hortenstine, Barksdale Hortenstine and Barksdale Hortenstine
Defendant:
COXCOM Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. CoxCom Inc
as 5:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kristi L Thompson
Defendant:
CoxCom Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gelder v. Coxcom, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Bradley Gelder, Bradley Gelder and Bradley Gelder
Defendant:
Coxcom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
