Cases 1 - 10 of 181
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
PATTON v. STAMPER et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
OMARI PATTON
Defendant:
KEITH STAMPER, CRAIG HALLER and JENNIFER HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYWOOD v. AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
CRAIG HAYWOOD
Defendant:
AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
KRIEGER v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02074
Plaintiff:
CRAIG KRIEGER
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
PINEDA DURAN v. LOWE
as 2:2023cv02019
Petitioner:
JOSE PINEDA DURAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF PIKE COUNT CRAIGE LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FAULDS v. HASSAN et al
as 2:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
KAMI FAULDS
Defendant:
MOHAMED HASSAN, SR., CRAIG TRANSPORTATION CO. and EXPRESS TRANS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
DAGNE v. LOWE et al
as 2:2023cv01622
Petitioner:
NATNAEL T. DAGNE
Respondent:
CRAIGE LOWE and WARDEN OF PIKE COUNTY CORR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. MCVICKERS et al
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CRAIG BROWN
Defendant:
SARGEANT MCVICKERS and UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OF SCI SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
