Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Bockman v. Craig's Tulsa RV, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Michael Bockman
Defendant:
Craig's Tulsa RV, LLC D/B/A Tulsa RV, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company - Tulsa RV and DRV, LLC D/B/A DRV Luxury Suites, an Indiana Limited Liability Company - DRV Luxury Suites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Long v. Perry City of et al
as 5:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Robert Long
Defendant:
Perry City of, Craig Higley, Brian Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perry v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00511
Petitioner:
Elston Craig Perry
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. Aluma-Weld, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Craig Holman
Defendant:
Aluma-Weld, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
