Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clausen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00903
Plaintiff:
Craig Clausen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Craig Clausen et al
as 8:2020cv01214
Defendant:
CRAIG CLAUSEN, Trustee, CLAUSEN FAMILY EXEMPTION TRUST, RELIANT REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members and Anna Marie Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clemons v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv07006
Plaintiff:
John Leroy Clemons
Defendant:
Don Anderson, John Flynn, Craig Clausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Anderson et al
as 1:2015cv02966
Plaintiff:
John Leroy Clemons
Defendant:
Don Anderson, John Flynn, Denise Losoloust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn, et al v. Board of County Commissioner
as 15-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT QUINN, an individual, KAREN QUINN, an individual, PATRICIA RODENZ, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ELBERT COUNTY
Quinn et al v. Mulvihill et al
as 1:2013cv02818
Plaintiff:
Robert Quinn , Patricia Rodenz , Karen Quinn and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Elbert County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Clearlake Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
James La Vell Harris
Defendant:
Clearlake Police Department, Craig Clausen, Tim Celli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pryor v. City of Clearlake et al
as 1:2011cv00954
Plaintiff:
Sean Pryor
Defendant:
City of Clearlake, Carl Miller, Alan Wade McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. City of Clearlake et al
as 4:2011cv00954
Plaintiff:
Sean Pryor
Defendant:
City of Clearlake , Carl Miller , Alan Wade McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
