Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Rodriguez v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
David O. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Cuevas, Hopis, J. Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Taylor v. Cueva
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Arthur Taylor
Respondent:
D. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Cuevas v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-10438
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CUEVAS
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and FULTON COUNTY JUDGE
Hernandez Cuevas, Silvio Omar v. Monroe County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv10016
Plaintiff:
Silvio Omar Hernandez Cuevas
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff Department and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Taylor v. D. Cueva
as 2:2023cv10408
Petitioner:
Arthur Taylor
Respondent:
D. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennison #143931 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Andre Dennison
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, David Shinn, J Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Mester v. Dan Cueva
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Morris Mester
Respondent:
Dan Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
